Thursday, February 19, 2026

New Swedish Frigate

ComNavOps has long considered the Swedish Visby class corvette as the gold standard of modern, total stealth warship design (not perfect ... just the best out there).  That makes the conceptual design for the next Swedish frigate, a larger vessel than the Visby, seemingly obvious:  simply upsize the Visby and add a few more weapons.  However, that seems not to be the case.  The candidates for the next Swedish frigate appear to be the existing (parent??) designs listed below:
 
  • Saab/Babcock - Arrowhead 120 (variant of the Arrowhead 140)
  • Naval Group (France) - FDI frigate
  • Navantia (Spain) - Alfa 4000 light frigate
 
As a quick reminder, Visby is 238 ft and 840 tons.  For comparison, the Arrowhead 120 is 406 ft and 4,650 tons.
 
None of the candidates exhibit anything approaching the maximum stealth and total signature reduction the modern naval battlefield requires and all would seem to be a significant step back from the Visby in that regard.  Honestly, the parallels between this and the US Navy’s failed Constellation program which attempted to build a “new”, 20+ year old, already obsolete frigate from a parent design, are eerie.
 
Sweden is looking to acquire four frigates from one of the companies listed above.  The contract for four ships is estimated to be between $4.5B -$6.7B(USD) which would be $1.1B - $1.7B(USD) per ship and, of course, no estimate ever comes in on budget so the real cost would likely be pushing $2B or more which seems excessive for relatively simple, dated frigates.
 
I assumed Sweden would simply scale up the Visby design for frigtes/destroyers.  That would be eminently logical and, indeed, that was the original idea for the Visby Generation 2 design.
 
Initially in 2021, FMV [Swedish Defence Materiel Administration] awarded Saab Kockums a contract for the product definition phase of the Visby Generation 2 corvettes, a new class based on the existing Visby-class stealth vessels … [1]
 
However, the program was canceled in 2023 amid Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and Sweden’s push toward NATO membership (finalized in 2024), leading to Saab teaming up with Babcock for a new, larger design.[1]

Somehow, in moving from the world’s stealthiest corvette to a “new” dated frigate, Sweden lost sight of what’s important for survival and combat-effectiveness on the modern naval battlefield.  Did some US admirals join the Swedish navy?
 
Arrowhead 120


I fully support the idea of a larger ship than the Visby but why go for a less capable and less survivable one?  Surely, the Visby could be scaled up from a corvette to a frigate without violating any “laws” of shipbuilding.
 
I guess it’s not just the US Navy that engages in perplexing behavior.
 
 
 
______________________________
 
[1]Breaking Defense website, “Saab, Babcock bank on Arrowhead 120 design for Sweden’s next frigate”, Jonas Olsson, 13-Feb-2026,
https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/saab-babcock-bank-on-arrowhead-120-design-for-swedens-next-frigate/

5 comments:

  1. Sweden is part of a bigger team now and are building some ships with range and endurance, similar to Finland.
    FDI started in 2015 and the first hull was just commissioned.
    Alpha 4000 is a concept only at this point.
    If you count Arrowhead as truly a scaled down Arrowhead 140, the 140 is to enter service this year or next. Sure, derived from Absolon/ Iver Huitfeldt class. CODAD is hardly obsolete.
    Reality is, there is little precedent for a larger composite ship. The largest composite hull to date is within 5 meters of length and beam of the Visby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. " there is little precedent for a larger composite ship. The largest composite hull to date is within 5 meters of length and beam of the Visby."

      You're aware of the Zumwalt, right? The entire superstructure is a composite. That aside, the Visby's achievement is its shape, lack of protuberances, and overall signature reduction, not its use of composites. It is unclear to what degree its composite materials contribute to that, if at all, and the same effect can be achieved with steel.

      Delete
  2. Visby was an anti-sub corvette this new ship is an air-defence frigate so the large air search radar alone is going to make it less stealthy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "the large air search radar alone is going to make it less stealthy."

      Incorrect. Radars can, and should, be some type of flat array blended into the superstructure and, perhaps, behind a drop down cover if further signature reduction is required or placed behind covers.

      Various ship classes have placed their radars behind "transparent" mast covers for signature reduction while still allowing the radars to function.

      Clearly, you haven't been closely following the blog. We've discussed many aspects of signature reduction for weapons and sensors. Please make use of the archives!

      Delete
    2. Have you studied the radar placement of Visby, San Antonio, Zumwalt, various Japanese classes, and others?

      Delete

Comments will be moderated for posts older than 7 days in order to reduce spam.