Here’s an interesting tidbit
about Aegis cruiser maintenance and upgrades.
BAE Systems Norfolk Ship
Repair, Norfolk, Virginia, is being awarded a $38.6M modification to a
previously awarded contract (N00024-11-C-4403) for USS Leyte Gulf (CG-55)
fiscal 2015 extended docking selected restricted availability (ED-SRA). Work
is expected to be completed by February 2016.
Remember that the Navy told
us it would take 4 years to modernize an Aegis cruiser which is why they had to
take 11 cruisers out of service? Well,
here’s a significant maintenance and upgrade for an Aegis cruiser that is only
going to cost $38.6M and be completed in less than seven months (it doesn’t say
when the start date is).
To be fair, I don’t know
what the complete scope of work is for either this availability or the Navy’s
proposed four year modernization.
The other interesting aspect
to this is that we often discuss modernization upgrades as a possible
alternative to new construction. For
example, what if the Perry’s had been upgraded instead of retired in favor of
new LCSs? During these discussions,
people often fling costs around with little or no supporting data – the costs, predictably, being either outrageously high or low as needed to support the
position being argued.
I’d like to gather some
supporting costs for those types of discussions. Of course, an Aegis cruiser ED-SRA is not an
exact match for anything other than what it is.
It is not, to use the previous example, an exact match for, and estimate
of, the cost to modernize a Perry. Still, this is a pretty extensive piece of
work on a pretty sophisticated ship and should, therefore, offer some insight
into modernization costs. The next time
someone argues for modernization and claims a cost of $10M, I’ll have data that
suggests that’s not a realistic figure.
Similarly, the next time someone argues against modernization and claims
a cost of $750M, I’ll have data that suggests that’s not a realistic figure.
I’ll gather a few of these
data points over time and across a range of upgrades and maintenance and see
what kind of cost numbers are realistic. I’ll share them with you as I come across
them.
Sounds like BAE are just doing a regular hull and mechanical systems repairs and upgrades. Unless the contract mentions Lockheed Martin they aren't touching the Aegis system.
ReplyDeletelike this one:
Lockheed Martin, Mission Systems and Training, Moorestown, New Jersey, is being awarded a $26,2 million modification to a previously awarded contract to incrementally fund the Aegis Platform Systems Engineering Agent (PSEA) activities and Aegis Modernization Advanced Capability Build engineering.
or this report which is older (2009) but has more detail
http://www.securityinfowatch.com/news/10490237/lockheed-martin-awarded-786-million-contract-to-produce-upgrades-for-aegis-weapon-system
It looks like your early retirement hypothesis might be right. It doesn't sound like much of an upgrade at all.
ReplyDeleteThen after that, there's my hypothesis of sunk like the Spruance class.