Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Spruance Contract???

Well, here’s an absolutely fascinating bit of Navy contract news.

“Huntington Ingalls Inc., Pascagoula, Mississippi, is being awarded a $12,511,359 cost-plus-award-fee contract modification to previously awarded contract N00024-12-C-4323 to provide long lead-time material procurement and planning yard services for CG-47-class cruisers and DD 963-class destroyers.“

The DD-963 class is the Spruance class and, as far as I know, they’ve all been converted to uni-directional diving submarines. 

I don’t know if this is some kind of outdated cut and paste error or what.  I know there’s waste and fraud in the Department of Defense but working on non-existent ships seems a bit over the top!

Do any of you have any idea what this is referring to?


  1. USS Paul F Foster is still in operation as a Ship Self Defense Ship. She is a Spruance, albeit non-deployable.

    1. That should be ex-Paul F Foster. Technically she is no longer a USS.

    2. Ah, good catch! I'd forgotten about the test ship. Thanks!

  2. Two interesting things:

    A) The Tico's need yard work that requires long lead time materiels
    B) The Spru-Cans are referred to in the plural.

    B makes me think this is a typo of some sort.

    Too bad. With the current submarine environment out there a modernized Spruance would be a useful ship to have around.

  3. Bait ships?

    No, probably too innovative for our Admirals.

  4. I believe Ingalls is the planning yard for the CG-47, as it was for the DD-963, so this is probably just a standard renewal of that standing contract for the ongoing services associated with being the planning yard ("long lead time procurement" and "planning yard services").


Comments will be moderated for posts older than 7 days in order to reduce spam.