Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Book Review – Electronic Greyhounds

The Spruance class destroyer (DD-963) was, arguably, the best ASW vessel ever produced but it had another, more impactful claim to fame.  It was the first ship designed by industry instead of the Navy/BuShips.  This practice of abdicating design capability and responsibility to industry has plagued become the standard Navy practice ever since.
 
The Spruance construction contract was awarded in 1970, prior to the advent of the digital age and widespread Internet use.  Thus, documentation on the class is sparse and limited largely to brief, repetitive entries in a handful of books.  This changed, however, in 1995 when Capt. Michael C. Potter, USNR, authored Electronic Greyhounds, the definitive book on the Spruance class design, construction, capabilities, and operations.[1]
 



The hardcover (roughly 8.5" x 11") book is a 270 page masterpiece of documentation with hundreds of references and citations from all manner of sources.  In fact, the note citation sources are nearly as fascinating and informative as the chapters themselves!
 
The book’s content can be best summarized by the chapter headings:
 
1.   Destroyers during the Cold War, 1948-1962
2.   Destroyers on Trial:  McNamara, Rickover, and Vietnam
3.   The Navy Adopts Total Package Procurement
4.   The DX/DXG Project
5.   The DD963 Design Competition
6.   Design Selection and Completion
7.   Construction and Controversy
8.   Fleet Introduction, Engineering, and Supply
9.   Gunnery, Electronics, and Antimissile Weapons
10. Strike Weapons
11. Antisubmarine Warfare
12. The Kidd (DDG993) Class
13. The Shield of the Fleet:  The Aegis Cruisers
14. Operations
 
Even the Appendices are fascinating:
 
Appendix A. Documents on the Origin of DX/DXG
Appendix B. A Tour of a Spruance-Class Destroyer
Appendix C. Name Histories
Appendix D. Specifications
 
Dozens of photographs and drawings support each chapter and illustrate key points.  The ship’s internal layout schematic is particularly interesting as is the profile photo with every electronic sensor/comm device labeled.  Understand, though, that this is not a coffee table ‘picture book’ by any means.
 
If there’s something you want to know about the Spruance class and it’s not in this book, it’s probably classified.  That said, be aware that this is not a lively, entertaining, near-fictional storytelling.  It is a deep-dive, scholarly tome with an emphasis on documented facts.  As such, it is not for the casual reader looking for adventure stories about ships although the chapter on ‘Operations’ is fascinating.  This book is a comprehensive reference for the reader looking for facts and details about the Spruance class and, as such, is very highly recommended.
 
 
Author:  Among Capt. Potter’s impressive and varied naval assignments, he served on a Spruance destroyer and as a defense contracting officer.  He also worked in industry as a systems analyst and project manager.  His background makes an ideal basis for researching and writing the history of the Spruance class.
 
 
Disclaimer:  I had a brief correspondence with the author suggesting that he write a similar book about the LCS.  Beyond that, I have no connection with the author, the book, or the publisher.
 
 
_____________________________
 
[1]Capt. Michael C. Potter, USNR, Electronic Greyhounds, The Spruance-Class Destroyers, Naval Institute Press, 1995, ISBN 1-55750-682-5

11 comments:

  1. I'd have to be making that kind of money working at home to afford that book! haha

    I have had good luck reading CNO's book recommendations, but the cheapest copy on ebay for this one has bidding starting at $84.99!!!!! ouch

    Maybe I can snag one at a used book store.

    Lutefisk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I take the recommendation responsibility seriously so let me again emphasize that this is more of a comprehensive reference book than a casual reading book. If you have an interest in the details of the Spruance class, this is the book for you. If you just want a casual read, this may not be the book. Judge accordingly!

      Delete
  2. Def somthing Ill have to get added to the "to get" list. Ive always had a fondness for the Spruances. My dad worked in the Sonar Shop of LBNS from '65-'80 after retiring from the Navy '41-'64. I spent untold days climbing around the drydocks as a kid, and was aboard (or underneath) many a Spruance (lots of Knoxes too). I recall a significant trend of the brand new ships failing acceptance trials, due to the Goodyear rubber "window" on the sonar dome having bumps, bulges and other irregularities that caused excess flow noise, and many of them had to be replaced.
    I actually spent an overnight with dad aboard O'Brien during her sea trials (which she failed for the aforementioned reason) Slept in the COs cabin, got to play on the consoles in CIC...they even set up a fake Soviet bogie for me to track on the air-search, and they set off the alarms when it got "dangerously close"!!!
    The Sprus were boxy, and not exactly sexy- but they still had strong purposeful lines. I always enjoyed seeing them at sea. Great memories. A shame...the class deserved a better fate...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Totally agree with you CNO, this book is great ! It's not very common to find this level of information. Along the same lines I would recommend the article about the S3 Viking in World air Power Journal issue 34.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Said it numerous times, we need a CNO book club or CNO book review! ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Click on the archives keyword "Book Review" and you'll get half a dozen or so book reviews! I'll keep adding to it from time to time.

      Delete
  5. Not to hijack the post, but I just read somthing that ties into the CNO thoughts from 2018 in "Aegis Cruiser Retirement..." and others. Clearly the navy played a shell game with the cruisers in their faux modernization program, and once the ships were idled, the had no intention of them returning to the fleet... As suspected.

    https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2023/10/03/the-navys-continuing-cruiser-debacle/
    Its disturbing how the Navy continually sidesteps Congress and seems to do whatever they want without penalty or accountability...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Navy executed their plan perfectly. Congress thwarted the Navy's attempt to retire the ships so the Navy simply parked the ships in a bogus modernization program until they literally totted away to the point that Congress couldn't say no to retirement. Criminally unethical but brilliant.

      Delete
  6. How does the armor scheme of the Spruance class matchup with the Burke Class. We know that the Burke's armor is nil !

    ReplyDelete
  7. Before I changed states I used to check it out regularly from my public library. In some ways the Spruance was actually what the LCS class was supposedly meant to be--modular. Not in the half-assed way the LCS was done, but a common hull with different purposes: An ASW (Sprus), Anti-air cruiser (Ticos), and on the design board were micro-carriers and other unrealized variants. The sensors were different, some armament differed, even the manning differed but it was a common hull. The modularity was mostly in the method of construction not the actual mission.

    But it begs one question:
    Could we make more of them? I mean, civilians designed it but the Navy owns the plans, so can't they commission new ones? I realize that's a gross oversimplification, but other than updating the sensors and some other systems, how much redesign does it really need? Especially the Spruance ASW itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The modularity was mostly in the method of construction not the actual mission."

      That's a critical distinction as regards modularity. The Spruance was modular only in the sense of common weapon pits. The modification to Ticos or the helo-ASW version was not modularity, it was a change in design using a common hull as a starting point.

      To be fair to the LCS, it envisioned a completely different type of modularity.

      "how much redesign does it really need?"

      Lots! It would need a complete redesign to incorporate maximum stealth, not just new sensors but an all new sensor scheme emphasizing passive sensing, much more distributed VLS, extensive UAV capability, extensive armor, complete survivability redesign (redundancy, separation, and backups), VDS capability, much more extensive close in defensive weapons, and so on.

      Delete

Comments will be moderated for posts older than 7 days in order to reduce spam.