It has been 9 months since USS Connecticut, SSN-22, suffered
an underwater collision with a sea mount in the South China Sea. Let’s review the timetable with an eye
towards what this tells us about our potential wartime battle damage repair
capability and capacity.
2-Oct-2021 Collision with sea mount in South China
Sea
8-Oct-2021 Arrived Guam for temporary repairs
4-Nov-2021 CO, XO, COB reported relieved
18-Nov-2021 Leaves Guam for temporary repair sea trial
12-Dec-2021 Arrives San Diego after surface transit from
Guam
15-Dec-2021 Left
San Diego, CA
20-Dec-2021 Arrived Puget Sound for thorough damage
assessment
21-Dec-2021 Arrived
Bremerton, WA for repairs
?-Feb-2023 Scheduled start of permanent repairs
The
damage is expected to be repaired during a scheduled Extended Docking Selected
Restricted Availability starting in February 2023.[2]
If – and that’s a very big ‘if’ – the repairs start on time in
Feb 2023, it will have been 16 months since the collision. That’s a pretty poor repair response for
peacetime and would be atrocious during war.
Here is what little we know about the extent of the
damage. Based on photos – because the Navy
isn’t saying anything – the bow was sheared off (or removed as part of
temporary repairs) and the sonar dome is gone, presumably resting at the bottom
of the South China Sea.[2] Reports
suggest that the rudder is damaged, as well.
What will that cost to repair? Here is a hint at the magnitude of the
eventual repair bill.
Buried
deep in the National Defense Authorization Act, two lines—crafted to prevent
easy searching—authorize the Navy to receive an initial tranche of $50 million
in repair funds—$10 million for a “spare Seawolf class bow dome” (page 1815)
and $40 million for “USS Connecticut emergent repairs” (page 1850).[1]
That’s $50M just for the beginning of the repair bill,
largely intended to cover long lead items.
A reasonable guess would put the final repair bill in the $300M-$400M
range.
As a comparison, here is the cost and timing for a similar
repair on the Los Angeles class submarine, USS San Francisco:
In
2005, the USS San Francisco, a Los Angeles-class fast-attack submarine, also
struck an underwater mountain, a crash that killed a sailor and injured 97
others. It took 3 1/2 years in Puget Sound to install a sonar dome from the
decommissioned USS Honolulu onto the boat, in maintenance that in total cost
$134 million.[3]
 |
| USS San Francisco |
The USS McCain required 2 yrs and 2 months to complete
repairs. The USS Fitzgerald required 3
yrs to return to active duty and repair costs were reported as $327M[4].
We’re looking at a 2025-2026 time frame to return to active
service. That’s four or five years to
effect repairs and that’s only if the repairs start on time which I strongly
doubt will happen.
This incident and the Navy’s near state of paralysis
regarding the repairs tells us what we need to know about our ability to deal
with wartime battle damage … we have
no abililty!
Damage repair, whether due to combat or accidents, is
critical for the maintenance of a strong fleet.
Our repair capacity is almost non-existent, repair timelines are
terrible, and costs are enormous. Our
repair response is atrocious. We have no
ability to ‘surge’ a repair.
‘Surge’ a repair?
Yes! If you recall, the USS
Yorktown, CV-5, was badly damaged at the Battle of the Coral Sea. Repair estimates were for 90 days. In a massive repair surge, Yorktown was
repaired in 3 days and sailed to participate in the Battle of Midway. The repair surge involved 1400 men and required
rolling blackouts in Hawaii to supply the required power for the repair effort.
Connecticut’s repair surge is going to require something on
the order of 4-5+ years.
Yikes!
We are not ready for war.
___________________________________
[1]Forbes website, “Congress Authorizes Millions For Repairs
Of USS Connecticut”, Craig Hooper, 20-Dec-2021,
https://www.forbes.com/sites/craighooper/2021/12/20/congress-authorizes-millions-for-uss-connecticut-ssn-22-repairs/?sh=24e12022656c
[2]Naval News website, “U.S. Navy Comments On USS
Connecticut Submarine”, Peter Ong, 5-Jul-2022,
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/07/u-s-navy-comments-on-uss-connecticut-submarine/
[3]Yahoo News website, “USS Connecticut, damaged in crash
with underwater mountain, arrives in Bremerton”, Josh Farley, 21-Dec-2021,
https://www.yahoo.com/news/uss-connecticut-damaged-crash-underwater-220043902.html
[4]USNI News website, “USS Fitzgerald Leaves Mississippi
Drydock After More Than a Year of Repairs”, Sam LaGrone, 16-Apr-2019,
https://news.usni.org/2019/04/16/uss-fitzgerald-leaves-mississippi-drydock-after-more-than-a-year-of-repairs